Re: Test lab
От | Mark Wong |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Test lab |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20071102172540.7d41701c.markwkm@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Test lab (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Test lab
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 15:20:27 -0400 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes: > > My question is -hackers, is who wants first bite and what do they > > want :) > > Something I'd like to have back real soon is the daily DBT run against > CVS HEAD that Mark Wong was doing at OSDL. Maybe we don't need a > particularly enormous machine for that, but comparable runs day after > day are real nice for noting when patches had unexpected performance > impacts... I expect the processors in this system to be faster than what I was using but this system does have about a third of thenumber of spindles I had previously. In my spare time I am trying to complete a TPC-E implementation (dbt5) to the currentspec revision and it is supposed to have significantly less disk requirements than the TPC-C derivative (dbt2) I wasusing in the past. If we believe TPC-E achieved all its goals, I think it would be appropriate to start using that assoon as the kit is ready. Anyway want to help with the kit? :) It's the C stored functions that need to be revised. Regards, Mark
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: