Re: Proposal: real procedures again (8.4)
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal: real procedures again (8.4) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20071029223211.GB19726@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal: real procedures again (8.4) (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposal: real procedures again (8.4)
Re: Proposal: real procedures again (8.4) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Gregory Stark wrote: > "Hannu Krosing" <hannu@skype.net> writes: > > > What I was referring to, was a "code cleanup" of libpq several years > > ago, when someone (maybe Bruce IIRC) removed ability to accept multiple > > recordsets from backend altogether, on the basis that it is not used > > anyway. > > You can still receive multiple record sets just fine using libpq. psql doesn't > handle them but they're there. When I was doing the concurrent psql patch I > also had it handling multiple record sets. > > Something else you may be thinking of, I don't think it's legal to do queries > like "select 1 ; select 2" in the new protocol. That was legal in the old > protocol. I think the cool thing that Josh Berkus wants is return query select a, b, c from foo; return query select d, e, f from bar; in a plpgsql function, and getting two result sets (I'm fuzzy about the exact syntax but you get the idea). Can this be done at all? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: