Re: [DOCS] Pattern for use of the alias "Postgres"
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [DOCS] Pattern for use of the alias "Postgres" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200710252010.l9PKAVn20205@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [DOCS] Pattern for use of the alias "Postgres" (Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@CommandPrompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [DOCS] Pattern for use of the alias "Postgres"
Re: [DOCS] Pattern for use of the alias "Postgres" Re: [DOCS] Pattern for use of the alias "Postgres" Re: [DOCS] Pattern for use of the alias "Postgres" |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Devrim G�ND�Z wrote: -- Start of PGP signed section. > On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 21:44 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > So, for the FAQ, which currently uses the second-entry-per-paragraph > > > logic, should it be changed to the logic suggested above where every > > > mention but the first is "Postgres"? (This will of course affect > > the > > > documentation changes when we are ready to discuss those.) > > > > Just undo the whole thing. The project name is what it is. > > +1. Let's not get sidetracked here. There was already agreement in advocacy to promote the use of the alias, and this thread is to discuss that, not to revisit whether we should use an alias or not. If you want to bring up that issue, start a thread and try to get agreement on it. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: