Re: Latin vs non-Latin words in text search parsing
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Latin vs non-Latin words in text search parsing |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20071023152852.GE18013@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Latin vs non-Latin words in text search parsing (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net> writes: > > On Oct 23, 2007, at 10:42 , Tom Lane wrote: > >> apart_hword Part of hyphenated word, all ASCII letters > >> part_hword Part of hyphenated word, all letters > >> numpart_hword Part of hyphenated word, mixed letters and digits > > > Is there a rationale for using these instead of hword_apart, > > hword_part and hword_numpart? > > Only that the category names were constructed that way in the contrib > module, and so this would seem familiar to existing tsearch2 users. > However, we are changing enough other details of the tsearch > configuration that maybe that's not a very strong consideration. > > I have no objection in principle to choosing nicer names, except > that I would like to avoid a long-drawn-out discussion. Is there > general approval of Michael's suggestion? +1 -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: