Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200710231055.50535.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4 (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
All, > We could release "alpha" releases. But that assumes that these reviews > actually result in stuff getting committed even if they're not 100% > complete. I think that would be a good thing but I don't think everyone > else agrees. Also, not all reviewers are committers. This is what I'm thinking, too. It would be a *lot* easier for the Sun peformance team (and presumably others) to test performance of stuff which was getting committed rather than having to hunt down *this* version of *that* patch and apply it against the snapshot from *this specific date* ... (puts PR hat on) it would also allow me to keep up a stream of info to the community and tech press about the new features and optimizations we're working on, which would mean better coverage for each feature. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL @ Sun San Francisco
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: