Re: max_prepared_transactions default ... why 5?
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: max_prepared_transactions default ... why 5? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200710172149.01326.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: max_prepared_transactions default ... why 5? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: max_prepared_transactions default ... why 5?
Re: max_prepared_transactions default ... why 5? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wednesday 17 October 2007 21:35, Tom Lane wrote: > Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes: > > I'm writing up the new GUCs, and noticed that max_prepared_transactions > > defaults to 5. This is too many for most applications (which don't use > > them at all) and far too few for applications which use them regularly. > > I think the intention was to have enough so you could test 'em (in > particular, run the regression tests) without eating resources for > the majority of installations that aren't using them. > > Certainly an installation that *is* using 'em would want a higher > setting. Yeah, given the amount of memory per xact, I guess we can't actually set the default higher. I just hate to see a setting that is liable to bite someone on the tuchas so easily. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL @ Sun San Francisco
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: