OK, item re-added. Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ian Barwick wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 October 2007 00:02, Robert Treat wrote:
> > On Tuesday 16 October 2007 15:46, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Robert Treat wrote:
> > > > On Friday 12 October 2007 14:04, Ian Barwick wrote:
> > > > > Hi
> > > > >
> > > > > attached some minor corrections, mainly completion of removal of
> > > > > the "relation with OID ##### does not exist" item, and some URL
> > > > > corrections.
> > > >
> > > > I'm curious why this was removed. We still get this question a bit on
> > > > irc and there aren't any more appropriate answers for any released
> > > > version than what the FAQ contained...
> > >
> > > The FAQ will match the release it goes with or we could just delay its
> > > removal until after 8.3 is in major circulation and say it only applies
> > > to pre-8.3.
> >
> > I think it should remain, with an addition that this problem should be
> > resolved as of PostgreSQL 8.3. Hard to say exactly when, but I would think
> > it would be at least untill 8.3 is released, and probably better would be 6
> > months or so later, when (hopefully) people stop asking about this. IMHO.
>
> Sounds sensible. (I removed it while going through checking for broken links
> etc., and the section numbering didn't match the contents; checking against
> CVS it appeared the intention of Revision 1.393 was to remove this item, cf.
> http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/doc/src/FAQ/FAQ.html#rev1.393
> ).
>
> Attached is an updated FAQ patch which re-includes this item and a note that
> it's been resolved in 8.3.
>
>
> Ian Barwick
[ Attachment, skipping... ]
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +