Re: Back-patch support for python 2.5?
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Back-patch support for python 2.5? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200710141918.58900.peter_e@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Back-patch support for python 2.5? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Back-patch support for python 2.5?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > I noticed that two of the buildfarm members are failing the 8.1 > branch because they're trying to build plpython with python 2.5. To > get that to work, I think we'd need to back-patch these two fixes: > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2006-11/msg00165.php > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-04/msg00043.php > Is that worth doing? Should we go further back than 8.1? I find these patches a bit excessive for backporting, especially 10 minor releases into the branch. Those who need Python 2.5 can use PostgreSQL 8.2. I consider that to be a new feature. The fact that the buildfarm exercises other combinations isn't evidence of a practical need. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: