Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review

Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 18:35 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> 
> > I think this project has got too big for us to make things up as we go 
> > along. We need to follow processes that are well understood and 
> > transparent.
> 
> Well said, I very much agree.
> 
> Mostly we do, but since we've just spent more than 6 months between
> Feature Freeze and Beta. There were no well understood or transparent
> processes during that period, so nobody is on solid ground trying to
> enforce a small number of rules with a single individual. Especially
> when discussing what might be argued was a major item in 8.3

What?  Even Jan agrees he didn't follow the procedures.  I have no idea
how you are coming to the conclusion there are no well understood
processes.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +