Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> 
> 
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >   
> >> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> >>     
> >>> I don't see how timing has anything to do with this.  You could have
> >>> added it between beta1 and beta2 after sufficient hackers discussion. 
> >>>       
> >> Uh, it *was* after beta1.
> >>     
> >
> > Oh, so it didn't hold up beta1 --- that's good.
> >
> >   
> 
> No it's not.
> 
> Can somebody please explain to me what beta means if you can commit new 
> stuff after it has been declared?

We allow /contrib to be more lax about beta changes.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +