Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200710082046.l98KkQj28574@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > > http://blogs.netapp.com/dave/2007/08/oracle-optimize.html > > > > Not a whole lot of technical content there, but pretty interesting > > nonetheless. I *think* that the issues we're seeing are largely in the > > NFS client-side kernel code, so bypassing that stack as Oracle is doing > > might eliminate the problem. Of course, there's a sizable amount of > > code to be written to do that ... > > Yeah. Next step we will be writing our own malloc. I assume there should be a ;-) in there because we already have our own malloc (palloc). -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: