Re: Encoding and i18n
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Encoding and i18n |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200710081241.42433.peter_e@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Encoding and i18n (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Am Samstag, 6. Oktober 2007 schrieb Tom Lane: > It's not real clear to me whether, on a Unix machine, there is even > supposed to be any difference between setting LC_TIME=es_ES.iso88591 and > setting it to es_ES.utf8. Since nl_langinfo(CODESET) is supposedly > determined only by LC_CTYPE, you could argue that strftime's results > should be in that encoding regardless, and that the codeset component of > other LC_ variables should be ignored. Some experimentation suggests > that at least in glibc it doesn't work that way, and that there is in > fact no principled way for you to find out what encoding strftime is > giving you :-(. It might be useful to research whether that behavior is following the spec (POSIX or whatever). -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: