Re: anoncvs.postgresql.org
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: anoncvs.postgresql.org |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20070925091427.GR6308@svr2.hagander.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: anoncvs.postgresql.org ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: anoncvs.postgresql.org
|
Список | pgsql-www |
Still waiting on this one.. Any status update or at least a basic timeframe on when we can expect a status update on the project of creating a timeframe for doing it? //Magnus On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 10:02:49AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > Magnus Hagander wrote: > > Marc, > > > > when can we expect something to happen about these issues? They're fairly > > critical, IMO. > > > > (I've removed the parts that were just what's done, what's left is just the > > TODO list of important things) > > Come on Marc... there is a list of todos below. Can we please see some > progress? (/me grumbles about the fact that he is currently documenting > community2) > > Joshua D. Drake > > > > > > //Magnus > > > > On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 03:22:05PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 02:34:54PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > >>> Marc, > >>> > >>> Also, wasn't the plan to move cvsup there as well? Any status on when that > >>> can happen? > >>> > >>> When can we expect sudo to be installed with the proper config for > >>> managers (incl accounts)? > >>> > >>> Finally, when can we expect some basic documentation of how the machine is > >>> set up? I have not documented the changes I did as stated above, since there > >>> is nowhere to document them yet. So please include them from the beginning. > >>> > >>> I notice the machine went into production already before we had docs - so > >>> it's fairly urgent now. We do have a policy of not bringing undocumented > >>> machines into production these days.... > >> FYI, I've also updated the server list since it said that the new anoncvs > >> machine wasn't in use yet. > >> > >> Is svr4 all dead now? I think you said so - in that case, it needs to be > >> wiped (it can still be pinged :-P), and it needs to be removed from the > >> documentation (which claims it's still the master ftp site?)
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: