Re: Open issues for HOT patch
| От | Decibel! |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Open issues for HOT patch |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20070918220811.GA95343@decibel.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Open issues for HOT patch (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Open issues for HOT patch
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 11:32:52AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Another option would be to prune whenever the free space goes > > below table fillfactor and hope that users would set fillfactor so that > > atleast one updated tuple can fit in the block. I know its not best to > > rely on the users though. But it can be good hint. > > If default fillfactor weren't 100% then this might be good ;-). But Erik Jones and I were just talking about FILLFACTOR... Is the plan to keep it at 100% with HOT? ISTM that's not such a great idea, since it forces at least the first update (if not many more) to be COLD. I realize that ideally we'd probably want FILLFACTOR to take things like average tuple size and average number of updates per page into account, but for a first pass 90% would likely be a good compromise... -- Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect decibel@decibel.org Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: