Re: partially effective revoke on pg_catalog
От | hubert depesz lubaczewski |
---|---|
Тема | Re: partially effective revoke on pg_catalog |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20070910171213.GA17063@depesz.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: partially effective revoke on pg_catalog (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 11:17:21AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > ok, but i belive it should either dont allow admin to do so, or, if it > > does allow, it should behave more consistently. > There are few "training wheels" for superuser mode. Try something like > "delete from pg_proc" if you are looking for ways to break your > database. i'm perfectly fine with "revoke from pg_catalog" not working/not allowed, but dont you think that the outcome should be a bit more consistent? if it would "break the database" - i'm happy with it. if it will reject hhe command as "it is not possible" - i'm happy with it. but now postgresql raports to user that revoke worked. and at first sight it actually does seem like it. but a second check showes that the revoke is not really 100% effective. again - i'm in no position to ask to give the ability to revoke the privileges. all i'm asking is to put some consistency - either break it, or forbid. but dont say "revoked" when it's not really true. depesz -- quicksil1er: "postgres is excellent, but like any DB it requires a highly paid DBA. here's my CV!" :) http://www.depesz.com/ - blog dla ciebie (i moje CV)
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: