Re: [PATCHES] Lazy xid assignment V4
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCHES] Lazy xid assignment V4 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200709052102.15463.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCHES] Lazy xid assignment V4 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCHES] Lazy xid assignment V4
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wednesday 05 September 2007 18:40, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> writes: > > I'm trying to decide how reasonable the use case is. We have transactions > > that run several hours long, often touching a number of tables, and I've > > used the transaction to get a list of all of the relations a given > > transaction is touching. This makes the above solution more annoying by > > far, but I don't do it often, and I think I generally use the pid to get > > that information anyway; if I used prepared transactions I'm sure I'd > > feel stronger about this. > > I don't see why you wouldn't start using the VXID for this purpose? > I'm not sure either :-) Though, it would be nice to have an easy way to see which transactions actually modified tables. Again, I not sure the use case is reasonable, but it's there. If no one else feels strongly, let's document a query to mimic the old column and move on. -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: