Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix brain fade in DefineIndex(): it was continuing to access the
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix brain fade in DefineIndex(): it was continuing to access the |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20070902224957.GC20519@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix brain fade in DefineIndex(): it was continuing to access the (ohp@pyrenet.fr) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix brain fade in DefineIndex(): it was continuing to access the
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote: > Hi Tom and Andrew, > > On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Tom Lane wrote: > > While waiting for my application for another animal, I made some tests and > was surprised that cluster test failed with an ordering error. This is running with CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS set, right? I think it is quite possible that an autovacuum came and processed the catalog, leading to different ordering. > Maybe an ORDER BY is missing in the test query. Yeah, an ORDER BY should be enough. > SELECT conname FROM pg_constraint WHERE conrelid = 'clstr_tst'::regclass; > conname > ---------------- > - clstr_tst_pkey > clstr_tst_con > (2 rows) > > SELECT relname, relkind, > --- 252,259 ---- > SELECT conname FROM pg_constraint WHERE conrelid = 'clstr_tst'::regclass; > conname > ---------------- > clstr_tst_con > + clstr_tst_pkey > (2 rows) -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: