Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 12:29:57PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Josh Berkus wrote:
> > Derek,
> >
> >> Regardless, even if Josh changes the company name, I believe that the
> >> benefits far outweigh that potential negative and we should move
> >> forward.
> >
> > You say that because you weren't around when PostgreSQL, Inc. was active.
> > There was a time when the *first* question I had to answer at a booth was
> > to explain that we were not PostgreSQL, Inc.  I don't want to go back to
> > that time.
>
> Nor do I. However, that was a different time and a time when PostgreSQL
> was barely known, which is certainly not the case now.

Well, there's a very simple way for you to ensure that's not an issue.
:)
--
Decibel!, aka Jim Nasby                        decibel@decibel.org
EnterpriseDB      http://enterprisedb.com      512.569.9461 (cell)