Re: The naming question WAS: Theme of this release: Performance?
От | Ron Peterson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: The naming question WAS: Theme of this release: Performance? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20070827193656.GA16381@yellowbank.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: The naming question WAS: Theme of this release: Performance? (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>) |
Ответы |
Re: The naming question WAS: Theme of this release: Performance?
Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
2007-08-27_14:49:54-0400 Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>: > I don't think that name change is buying us anything except _TONS_ of > work... Ditto that. Keep PostgreSQL. * It's google'able. Think of all of the documentation out there which refers to PostgreSQL. When people start searching for 'postgres' they'll get virtually nothing. * Why 'Postgres'? Any marketing effort this large should start from scratch, and consider all possibilities, not just default to something barely different for the sake of easing the terrible pronunciation challenge. * Maybe some people don't like PostgreSQL, but why assume everyone likes 'Postgres' better. I don't. -- Ron Peterson https://www.yellowbank.com/
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: