Re: MSVC build system
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: MSVC build system |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20070827183835.GG20539@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: MSVC build system (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: MSVC build system
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Neil Conway wrote: >> I don't mean to hijack your thread, but I wonder if maintaining two >> separate build systems is the best approach in the long term. I think >> CMake[1] is an interesting alternative: it would allow us to generate >> both makefiles and MSVC .proj's from a single set of master build files. > > I would be more than happy if we had a single build system. Maybe some > enterprising person would like to try to create such a system as a proof of > concept. I count around 200 makefiles in our sources ;-) > > Of course, we'd need to know that cmake was pretty universally available > too. That, or we create the makefiles in a fixed system and keep the Makefiles in CVS (though would be derived files). -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: