BUG #3563: DATESTYLE feature suggestion
От | Randolf Richardson |
---|---|
Тема | BUG #3563: DATESTYLE feature suggestion |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200708212353.l7LNrWId086062@wwwmaster.postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #3563: DATESTYLE feature suggestion
Re: BUG #3563: DATESTYLE feature suggestion Re: BUG #3563: DATESTYLE feature suggestion Re: BUG #3563: DATESTYLE feature suggestion |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 3563 Logged by: Randolf Richardson Email address: randolf+postgresql.org@inter-corporate.com PostgreSQL version: 8.2.4 Operating system: NetBSD 4 (beta), NetBSD 3.1, NetWare 6.5 Description: DATESTYLE feature suggestion Details: After convincing clients and colleagues to switch from Oracle (and others) to PostgreSQL, an issue that comes up is the need to customize DATESTYLE. Because this isn't possible, the developers who were against the move to PostgreSQL make it political and recommended work-around solutions such as using to_char() or implementing a view for each table that contain TIMESTAMP[TZ]s is very difficult to argue with management because a lot of time is required to implement these items. In a future version, to solve this problem, an additional DATESTYLE option that uses the same rules as the to_char() function for date formatting would solve this problem. Here's an example: SET DATESTYLE = 'Custom YYYY-Mon-DD'; This feature would not only resolve this particular political strife, but would also solve many other problems, including simplifying coding for raw SQL output serving as reports (e.g., users still get confused about dates like "2007-06-03," wondering if they refer to June 3rd, or March 6th). I'm hoping that this suggestion will be an easy one to implement. Thanks in advance. P.S.: I searched around for a "feature suggestions" page but couldn't find it (if one exists, it should be linked to from the "Report a Bug" page).
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: