Re: 12 Silver Bullets
От | Decibel! |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 12 Silver Bullets |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20070816155147.GI54309@nasby.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 12 Silver Bullets (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 11:47:12AM -0400, Robert Treat wrote: > On Thursday 16 August 2007 03:46, vincent wrote: > > > On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Simon Riggs wrote: > > >>> 2. Robust transactional ACID behavior under all circumstances > > >> > > >> Async commit changes that, since it relaxes the Durability aspect. > > > > > > And one can wreak havoc right now if you turn fsync off. Maybe the > > > wording may need to be tweaked here. The disclaimer in the detailed > > > document is "barring hardware failure or grossly improper configuration". > > > If you expected ACID, but used Async commit, that certainly falls into > > > the improper configuration category. > > > > Does the reader really need to know so many details in a list like this? > > > > PgSQL defaults to ACID, which is the point I'd like to make in a list like > > this; the user does not have to do anything special to get ACID, unlike > > some databases who shall rename nameless... > > > > The windows default table type for mysql is innodb, which is ACID. Since > 50% > of thier users work on windows (perhaps not deploy, but do > development/testing) this means that most of them are getting ACID out of the > box as well. What about the catalogs? ACID user tables don't do much good if your catalog is hosed after a crash... -- Decibel!, aka Jim Nasby decibel@decibel.org EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
Вложения
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: