Re: Quality of email postings

Gregory Stark wrote:
>
> "Bruce Momjian" <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
>
> > I am getting concerned about the quality of email traffic on the
> > advocacy list.  It seems postings are often not fully formed ideas and
> > that threads frequently go on and on with few conclusions.  I am
> > thinking there has to be more leadership in keeping threads on track,
> > and more focus in emails.
>
> I propose that we restrict advocacy to be writable by only the www team.
> Everyone else can send their suggested posts to them and they can edit them
> and post them. That way the discussions will represent only a professional
> appearance and we can avoid having porn posted on the advocacy mailing list.

That would be appropriate only if we created a new advocacy-announce
email list to function this way.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>          http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                               http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +