Re: crypting prosrc in pg_proc
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: crypting prosrc in pg_proc |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200708091825.32878.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: crypting prosrc in pg_proc ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thursday 09 August 2007 11:30, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Andrew Sullivan wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 04:42:19PM +0200, Hans-Juergen Schoenig wrote: > >> the problem here is that vendors of appliances don't want people to > >> spider their codes. this is a fact - it is not the idea of open > >> source to do so but bloody reality. in addition to that people are > >> not willing to code everything in C just to hide. > > > > Well, then, they're out of luck. > > This whole thread can be summed up as: plpgsql is an interpretive > language, not a compiled on. > > You can and do see the source, just like perl, ruby, python, bash etc... > > If you don't like it, don't use it and use C instead. > > :) > > Keep in mind that the obfuscation techniques that can be used by python > and perl are all reversible. > Hmm.... I wonder if you could wire plphp through something like Zend Gaurd? -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: