Re: postgresql publication ---> was "Re: New MySQL Journal"
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgresql publication ---> was "Re: New MySQL Journal" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200707311006.37335.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgresql publication ---> was "Re: New MySQL Journal" ("Bob Zurek" <bob.zurek@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: postgresql publication ---> was "Re: New MySQL Journal"
Re: postgresql publication ---> was "Re: New MySQL Journal" Re: postgresql publication ---> was "Re: New MySQL Journal" |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
All, I'm personally dubvious about the advisability of having our own Journal vs. having regular articles in other people's publications. I don't think that we have so many writers in the community that doing a PostgreSQL journal wouldn't rob Linux magazines, sysadmin magazines, blogs, oreillynet etc. of content. If we think we have untapped writers, I'd rather push them to contribute to these publications, which will reach people who aren't PG users or have even heard of PG rather than the faithful. This would be especially the case with and online-only Journal, which nobody would stumble across on the newsstand by accident. I'd also be nervous about doing anything with SYS-CON Media given their rather tainted reputation in the OSS community. The only way this makes sense is if it would attract many new people to writing and publishing about PostgreSQL who otherwise wouldn't do it. If nothing else, I don't believe that our existing active writers are sufficient for a Journal. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL @ Sun San Francisco
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: