autovacuum default parameters (was Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3)
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | autovacuum default parameters (was Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20070724041444.GA18230@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3 (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: autovacuum default parameters (was Re: 8.2 is 30% better
in pgbench than 8.3)
Re: autovacuum default parameters (was Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3) Re: autovacuum default parameters |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Gregory Stark wrote: > "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > > >> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > >> > > >> > I am taking the liberty to also lower the vacuum and analyze threshold > >> > default values to 50, per previous discussion. > > Did we also reach any consensus about lowering the percentage of dead tuples > in a table before we trigger vacuum? I think 20% is way too high and 5% is > saner. I actually think it would be better even lower but would be ok with 5%. We didn't, but while I agree with the idea, I think 5% is too low. I don't want autovacuum to get excessively aggressive. Is 10% not enough? How about the analyze scale factor, should we keep the current 10%? I have less of a problem with reducing it further since analyze is cheaper than vacuum. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: