Re: Problem with recent PostgreSQL relatedpressrelease
От | Bill Moran |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Problem with recent PostgreSQL relatedpressrelease |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20070713144244.5a87c6a7.wmoran@potentialtech.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Problem with recent PostgreSQL relatedpressrelease (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
In response to Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>: > Bill Moran wrote: > > Here's a question for someone at EDB: If I ran a benchmark that demonstrates > > that database X is faster than EDB, then present my findings to your people > > and you find it to be honestly and fairly done, would you allow me to > > publish it? > > A larger question is whether EDB would sue a community member who did it > without their permission. Can you imagine that PR nightmare? Interesting twist. It's one of those things -- if you take it at face value it seems pretty rough, but if you look deeper, you realize that the practical side of it means that EDB can protect themselves from bullshit if need be. The other problem is that (as I understand law, although I'm no lawyer) if a community member _did_ do such a thing, and EDB decided not to sue for the reason you mention, they would weaken any lawsuit they would make thereafter, because of the whole "failure to enforce" thing. For that reason, I believe that EDB would _have_ to sue, in spite of the rift it would cause. Again, these are the things about business that I hate. Could a court be made to understand that there was no reason to sue someone who did an honest benchmark, but they should be upheld in suing someone who did a biased benchmark? Or would the court simply whine that, "your terms say X, and you were inconsistent in your enforcement of them."? -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: