Re: [GENERAL] Unable to get postgres running after long time no vacuum
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Unable to get postgres running after long time no vacuum |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20070709003835.GA9539@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Unable to get postgres running after long time no vacuum (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] Unable to get postgres running after long time no vacuum
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> At least on my machine there doesn't seem to be a defined way to > >> generate SIGTERM from the terminal; so I can see where if someone hasn't > >> read the postgres man page carefully, their first instinct upon finding > >> that control-C doesn't get them out of single-user mode might be to type > >> control-\ (or whatever the local QUIT character is). It doesn't seem > >> like it should be quite that easy to force a panic stop. > > > That seems reasonable, but I know an awful lot of people that don't know > > how to generate SIGQUIT at all (I only learned about it about a year > > ago, I think). In fact anyone who doesn't already know that Ctrl-D > > closes the session is not very likely to know about Ctrl-\. > > Sure, but those who do know how to SIGQUIT might reach for that before > they reach for control-D. There's hardly anyone out there who could > be called an experienced user of the standalone mode, I think, and so > we shouldn't assume that users always know control-D is the way out. I agree completely, but is that an argument _against_ a "quit" command? (Maybe the argument against the quit command is feature freeze.) -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: