Re: AutoVacuum Behaviour Question
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: AutoVacuum Behaviour Question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20070627225213.GD28580@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: AutoVacuum Behaviour Question (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: AutoVacuum Behaviour Question
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > How much is the age decremented by on a vacuum run then? > > It should be decremented to the vacuum_freeze_min_age. However, I'm > running some experiments with your settings and apparently it's not > working as it should. Nah, false alarm, it's working as expected for me. And I see the age of databases being correctly decreased to the freeze min age (plus however many transactions it took to do the vacuuming work). So I'm still at a loss on why is it failing to advance the datfrozenxid of your database. Please let me have a look at this query result while connected to that database: select relname, relfrozenxid from pg_class where relkind in ('r', 't'); You can change the relname to oid if showing the table names is problematic for you. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/5ZYLFMCVHXC Al principio era UNIX, y UNIX habló y dijo: "Hello world\n". No dijo "Hello New Jersey\n", ni "Hello USA\n".
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: