Re: msvc and vista fun
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: msvc and vista fun |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20070625141415.GF19058@svr2.hagander.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: msvc and vista fun (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: msvc and vista fun
Re: msvc and vista fun Re: msvc and vista fun |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 10:06:57AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > Magnus Hagander wrote: > > > >Can you run the build in "broken mode" but *without* using the buildfarm > >scripts, and see what errorlevel you get? Meaning: > >build.bat > >... wait ... > >echo %errorlevel% > > > >It should output 1 if that part works, 0 if it fails. That'll tell us if > >the problem is in the bf or if it's in the actual build system. > > > > > > > > It fails and says 1. > > Now, if I change the build script so it says > > exit %E > > instead of > > exit /b %E That's just weird :-( And making that change makes the script unusable from the commandline. > I pick up the exit status just fine. I wonder if wer have different > flavors of command interpreter? (My perl is the latest one from > ActiveState, btw. I assume you're using that.) cmd.exe from Windows - I assume you haven't installed some funky addon special command interpreter? In that case, it should be the same. So I have: Microsoft Windows [Version 5.2.3790] (C) Copyright 1985-2003 Microsoft Corp. As for perl, I'm probably not on the very latest, but it's not so old. I'm on: This is perl, v5.8.8 built for MSWin32-x64-multi-thread (with 33 registered patches, see perl -V for more detail) Dave - what version are you on? > Can we change that or make it switchable? I'd be happy to provide an > environment variable like RUNNING_BUILDFARM if that would help. We could, but it seems very ugly. And again, it's *not* required for buildfarm on my or Daves machines. So I'd rather like to know why it's actually happening than just blindly change it. //Magnus
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: