Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200706211438.55075.peter_e@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent
Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Am Donnerstag, 21. Juni 2007 00:38 schrieb Gregory Stark: > > I think people are worried that an 'm' in one column might mean something > > different than an 'm' in another column, and perhaps that is confusing. > > To whom? the person writing it? If everyone around here had gotten their way we'd already be in a situation were you could write log_rotation_age = 5m log_rotation_size = 5m And someone trained in the metric system would think, "What, five meters?". So it rotates when age and size are the same or what? And the ultimate consequence of that thinking is that the PostgreSQL developers are uneducated dummies and clearly PostgreSQL cannot be a quality product if they can't even get that right. So by all means add documentation and hints. Btw.: I'm currently at DebConf in Edinburgh. On Scottish motorway signage, "5m" means "five miles". Even the Americans do that better. So, no, you can't have "m" for "minutes". ;) -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: