Re: Performance query about large tables, lots of concurrent access

Karl Wright wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >Karl Wright wrote:
> >
> >>(b) the performance of individual queries had already degraded
> >>significantly in the same manner as what I'd seen before.
> >
> >You didn't answer whether you had smaller, more frequently updated
> >tables that need more vacuuming.  This comment makes me think you do.  I
> >think what you should be looking at is whether you can forget vacuuming
> >the whole database in one go, and make it more granular.
>
> I am afraid that I did answer this.  My largest tables are the ones
> continually being updated.  The smaller ones are updated only infrequently.

Can you afford to vacuum them in parallel?

--
Alvaro Herrera                  http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/5ZYLFMCVHXC
"Java is clearly an example of money oriented programming"  (A. Stepanov)