Re: [GENERAL] [PERFORM] [ADMIN] Postgres VS Oracle
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] [PERFORM] [ADMIN] Postgres VS Oracle |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200706191041.29998.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] [PERFORM] [ADMIN] Postgres VS Oracle (John Meyer <john.l.meyer@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tuesday 19 June 2007 00:05, John Meyer wrote: > Jonah H. Harris wrote: > > On 6/18/07, John Meyer <john.l.meyer@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Then Oracle fears its users, which explains the "no-benchmark" policy, > >> which I cannot see any PR honk being able to spin that in any way that > >> doesn't make Oracle look like it's hiding its head in the sand. > > > > The humor I see in constant closed-minded presumptions is slowly fading. > > This isn't even a straight out slam at Oracle. My degree comes in mass > communications, and I cannot understand how anybody could shake the > perception that Oracle is afraid of open, independent investigations of > its programs. > Let's take this at the most beneficial angle that we can, and that is > that Oracle has seen too many people run their programs straight into > the ground with some rather lousy benchmarking. If that's the case, > then the solution is not to bar each and every bench mark out there, it > is to publish the methodologies to properly tune an Oracle installation. > It is not to attempt to strangle conversation. You do realize that not everyone who publishes a benchmark will actually *want* to do a fair comparison, right? -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: