Re: Command tags in create/drop scripts
От | Jim C. Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Command tags in create/drop scripts |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20070609011221.GU92628@nasby.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Command tags in create/drop scripts (Andrew Hammond <andrew.george.hammond@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Command tags in create/drop scripts
Re: Command tags in create/drop scripts |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 05:52:39PM -0000, Andrew Hammond wrote: > On Jun 5, 9:19 am, alvhe...@commandprompt.com (Alvaro Herrera) wrote: > > Zdenek Kotala wrote: > > > Tom Lane wrote: > > > >Bruce Momjian <b...@momjian.us> writes: > > > >>Is this a TODO? > > > > > >I don't think so; there is no demand from anybody but Zdenek to remove > > > >those programs. Has it ever even come up before? > > > > Personally I found really strange to have "createuser" and "createdb" > > shipped by Postgres when I started using it. I just didn't complain. > > +1. Given the prevalence of the pg_foo convention, those names are > clunky. So is initdb. I'm less creative than Zdenek, so I'd suggest > simply renaming to pg_createuser and friends with the same command > line options as the originals. Have the binaries check $0 and emit a > warning about using the deprecated name to STDERR if called by a name > that doesn't have the pg_ prefix. Default to symlinking the old names > for backwards compatibility until 9.0. +1 -- Jim Nasby decibel@decibel.org EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: