Re: ECC RAM really needed?
От | Michael Stone |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ECC RAM really needed? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20070526124313.GU1785@mathom.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | ECC RAM really needed? (Craig James <craig_james@emolecules.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: ECC RAM really needed?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 06:45:15PM -0700, Craig James wrote: >We're thinking of building some new servers. We bought some a while back >that have ECC (error correcting) RAM, which is absurdly expensive compared >to the same amount of non-ECC RAM. Does anyone have any real-life data >about the error rate of non-ECC RAM, and whether it matters or not? In my >long career, I've never once had a computer that corrupted memory, or at >least I never knew if it did. ...because ECC RAM will correct single bit errors. FWIW, I've seen *a lot* of single bit errors over the years. Some systems are much better about reporting than others, but any system will have occasional errors. Also, if a stick starts to go bad you'll generally be told about with ECC memory, rather than having the system just start to flake out. Mike Stone
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: