Re: ECC RAM really needed?
От | Bruno Wolff III |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ECC RAM really needed? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20070526021553.GA8875@wolff.to обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | ECC RAM really needed? (Craig James <craig_james@emolecules.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: ECC RAM really needed?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 18:45:15 -0700, Craig James <craig_james@emolecules.com> wrote: > We're thinking of building some new servers. We bought some a while back > that have ECC (error correcting) RAM, which is absurdly expensive compared > to the same amount of non-ECC RAM. Does anyone have any real-life data > about the error rate of non-ECC RAM, and whether it matters or not? In my > long career, I've never once had a computer that corrupted memory, or at > least I never knew if it did. ECC sound like a good idea, but is it > solving a non-problem? In the past when I purchased ECC ram it wasn't that much more expensive than nonECC ram. Wikipedia suggests a rule of thumb of one error per month per gigabyte, though suggests error rates vary widely. They reference a paper that should provide you with more background.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: