Re: Postgres Benchmark Results
От | Jim C. Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres Benchmark Results |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20070521210125.GM62346@nasby.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres Benchmark Results (Zoltan Boszormenyi <zb@cybertec.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgres Benchmark Results
Re: Postgres Benchmark Results Re: Postgres Benchmark Results |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 08:00:25PM +0200, Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote: > I also went into benchmarking mode last night for my own > amusement when I read on the linux-kernel ML that > NCQ support for nForce5 chips was released. > I tried current PostgreSQL 8.3devel CVS. > pgbench over local TCP connection with > 25 clients and 3000 transacts/client gave me > around 445 tps before applying NCQ support. > 680 tps after. > > It went over 840 tps after adding HOT v7 patch, > still with 25 clients. It topped at 1062 tps with 3-4 clients. > I used a single Seagate 320GB SATA2 drive > for the test, which only has less than 40GB free. > So it's already at the end of the disk giving smaller > transfer rates then at the beginning. Filesystem is ext3. > Dual core Athlon64 X2 4200 in 64-bit mode. > I have never seen such a performance before > on a desktop machine. I'd be willing to bet money that the drive is lying about commits/fsync. Each transaction committed essentially requires one revolution of the drive with pg_xlog on it, so a 15kRPM drive limits you to 250TPS. BTW, PostgreSQL sees a big speed boost if you mount ext3 with the option data=writeback. Note that doing that probably has a negative impact on data recovery after a crash for non-database files. -- Jim Nasby decibel@decibel.org EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: