Re: Updated bitmap index patch
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Updated bitmap index patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20070517222027.GU28701@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Updated bitmap index patch (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Updated bitmap index patch
Re: Updated bitmap index patch Re: Updated bitmap index patch |
Список | pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Due to unfinished VACUUM: > > This has been saved for the 8.4 release: > > http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold While we're at this, let's consider Heikki's patch for the streaming indexscan API stuff. That patch was supposed to come from the bitmap index patch, but it was also supposed to help the Grouped Index Tuples (GIT) patch. In fact, as far as I understood the discussion, GIT would be helped by the streaming indexscan API patch, because it would help de-uglify certain parts of that patch. It is my impression that we would not want to commit the ugly GIT patch; so it would mean that either we commit the streaming indexscan patch first, and a beautiful GIT patch shortly later, or we don't commit any of them. So, the question is: do we want the GIT patch in 8.3? If we do, then we need the streaming indexscan API patch. And thus we would need an updated (beautiful) GIT patch. Is there a resolution on this? Alexey Kluykin and I would be interested in helping review this set of patches, if it is decided that they are wanted for 8.3. I want to point out that the GIT patch is one of the things sitting in the reviewing queue from very early. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: