Re: drupal.org MySQL database issues
От | Andrew Sullivan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: drupal.org MySQL database issues |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20070517201346.GE6907@phlogiston.dyndns.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: drupal.org MySQL database issues (Joshua Kramer <josh@globalherald.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: drupal.org MySQL database issues
Re: drupal.org MySQL database issues |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 03:40:04PM -0400, Joshua Kramer wrote: > Right, but if someone with PG and PHP skills put forth some effort to make > Plesk / CPanel play well with PG, then the marketing efforts would be that > much easier and the use of PG would probably increase. That's all that is > being said here. I understand that. But if the community is to take the argument seriously, someone needs to say what "play well" means there. So far I keep hearing that it doesn't, but only Robert Treat has suggested any meaningful detail about what that means. Is that all we're saying, that remote administration needs to be better? If so, I would suggest that a worthy project would be something like pg_remote_hand_daemon or something, which would be an optional component that you could use to do remote control of a postgres server. All the commands would go through the daemon, and it would be responsible for communicating with the clients (you do it this way to isolate the places where you have to work on the security model). Then you have it perform the configuration tasks on the postgresql node the way a human might do it -- alter the config file, SIGHUP, &c. (This is if you want humans manually changing your database systems, which I don't. That's what things like cfengine were invented to stop.) A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca A certain description of men are for getting out of debt, yet are against all taxes for raising money to pay it off. --Alexander Hamilton
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: