Re: Managing the community information stream
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Managing the community information stream |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20070516144650.GK4582@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Managing the community information stream (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Managing the community information stream
Re: Managing the community information stream |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > > > > > > > > In Debian's bug tracking system, when the bug is created (which is done > > > > > > by sending an email to a certain address) it gets a number, and the > > > > > > email is distributed to certain lists. People can then reply to that > > > > > > mail, and send messages to 12345@bugs.debian.org and it gets tracked in > > > > > > the bug, and you can see all those messages in the bug report. I > > > > > > ass-ume that BZ 3.0 does something similar. > > > > > > > > > > But often a TODO item has multiple threads containing details (often > > > > > months apart), and it isn't obvious at the time the thread is started > > > > > that this will happen. Note the number of TODO items that now have > > > > > multiple URLs. How is that handled? > > > > > > > > Just add the bug address to CC and reply to it, just like when you reply > > > > to say "added to TODO", only that you don't need to manually go and > > > > modify the TODO file by hand. The bug tracking system puts that mail > > > > into the bug report. Subsequent followups keep the bug address in CC > > > > and thus the whole discussion is saved in the bug report. > > > > > > Right, but you are adding the bug addresss at the end of the email > > > thread. How do you point to the email you want to reference? > > > > I am not sure. We will have to investigate more the capabilities of the > > bug tracking system we intend to use. In the worst case one could add > > the URL for the archived message copy; second worst would be bouncing > > (hopefully not forward) the interesting messages to the bug address. > > Sounds like what I do with the TODO list now. Except that this is the *worst case* with the bug tracker, whereas for the TODO list it is not only the worst case, it is also the best case and the only case at all. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: