Re: drupal.org MySQL database issues
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: drupal.org MySQL database issues |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200705161055.03231.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: drupal.org MySQL database issues (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: drupal.org MySQL database issues
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Brian, Jeff, > > I have never understood the purpose of having more than one "backend" to > > the database. As near as I can figure, it's only purpose is to allow > > people to pick the wrong one. Well, the real purpose of the backend storage engines is to make MySQL into more than one kind of database. MyISAM is for a single-user DB, InnoDB is for transactions, NDB is clustered & object, Ericsson is telecom, MemDB is in-memory, etc. It makes up for the fact that MySQL does not excel in any one database category if it is percieved to be adequate in all categories. > In MySQL, changing the "storage engine" can break user queries and > always requires a full data migration to the new format. Sure, but MySQL users and potential users don't perceive it that way -- they encounter the problems only long after they've made hard-to-revoke decisions to adopt MySQL. MySQL is still much, much better at marketing than we are. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL @ Sun San Francisco
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: