Re: Removing pg_auth_members.grantor (was Grantor name gets lost when grantor role dropped)
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Removing pg_auth_members.grantor (was Grantor name gets lost when grantor role dropped) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20070504201828.GA26685@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Removing pg_auth_members.grantor (was Grantor name gets lost when grantor role dropped) (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [BUGS] Removing pg_auth_members.grantor (was Grantor name gets lost when grantor role dropped)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost wrote: > I don't have time right at the moment (leaving shortly and will be gone > all weekend) but what I would do is check the SQL standard, especially > the information schema, for any requirement to track the grantor. Much > of what I did was based on the standard so that may have been the > instigation for tracking grantor. Hmm. I had forgotten the information schema. I just checked: the only view using pg_auth_members is APPLICABLE_ROLES, and that one doesn't display the grantor column. > Though, even without that, we track > the grantor of most other grants (possibly all currently?) and it seems > like a useful bit of information for DBAs to be able to know who granted > what to whom. I note that the grantor of ACLs are listed separately, for example in COLUMN_PRIVILEGES, ROLE_COLUMN_GRANTS, etc. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: