Re: [HACKERS] Wild idea: 9.0?
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Wild idea: 9.0? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200704240918.54598.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Wild idea: 9.0? ("Magnus Hagander" <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Wild idea: 9.0?
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tuesday 24 April 2007 01:32, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > > That would be just because you don't know the numbering scheme. 8.2 to > > > 8.3 is considered "major" in these parts. See > > > http://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning > > > > Is that official policy? I don't see any mention of it in the docs. > > Are you somehow suggesting that our website isn't official? Where did you > get that idea? > Website information can often be of a transient nature, with no history of changes or even the existence of information. Documentation is a little more permanent, and at least offers a record of agreement at a specific point in time. > As for inclusion in the docs I beleive we're still waiting for your > patch... > We'll see :-) -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: