Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20070418153004.GA19598@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout
Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Treat wrote: > On Tuesday 17 April 2007 20:54, Tom Lane wrote: > > I'm not excited about the other ones but I can see the argument for > > making pg_dump force the timeout to 0. > > Allowing pg_dump to run un-checked could also lead to problems such as > exceeding maintenence windows causing performance issues, or causing trouble > due to lock contention with ongoing pg_dumps. I have never ever seen a request to be able to control pg_dump and have it stop dumping if the time taken to dump exceeded a threshold. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: