Re: scan_recycle_buffers
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: scan_recycle_buffers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200704022310.l32NAwh17732@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: scan_recycle_buffers ("Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: scan_recycle_buffers
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Where is the final version of this patch? What patches are stuck in the patch moderator queue? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Simon Riggs wrote: > On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 07:59 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 18:05 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > > "Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > > > On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 16:45 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > > >> We do that anyway; but certainly Simon's patch ought not be injecting > > > >> an additional one. > > > > > > > It should be possible to pass that down from the planner to the > > > > executor, in certain cases. > > > > > > Huh? See HeapScanDesc->rs_nblocks. > > > > Many thanks. > > New patch enclosed, implementation as you've requested. > > Not ready to apply yet, but good for testing. > > COPY command now also uses this hint, to allow test results and > discussion. Others could also, perhaps needing different values. > > -- > Simon Riggs > EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com > [ Attachment, skipping... ] > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: