Re: Blocked post
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Blocked post |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200704021933.l32JXIr01326@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Blocked post (Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Blocked post
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Dave Page wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Simon Riggs wrote: > >> I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice > >> now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm > >> not sure what the problem is? > >> > >> Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00 > >> Sent: 1 Apr 12:11 TZ+01:00 > > > > What an obvious ploy to get more time for development. ;-) > > In a bid to stave off such accusations, Simon had a couple of us witness > the outgoing mail in his Sent Items folder. We can arrange for copies of > our notarized statements to be provided if necessary :-p Well, FAST posted emails dated April 4 a few days ago, proving email dates are not a valid method of authenticating the "sent" date. Perhaps FAST's post-dated emails were meant to throw us off of Simon's pre-dating them. ;-) -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: