Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code?
От | Mario Weilguni |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200703131642.36079.mweilguni@sime.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Am Dienstag, 13. März 2007 16:38 schrieb Joshua D. Drake: > Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > Albe Laurenz wrote: > >> A fix could be either that the server checks escape sequences for > >> validity > > > > This strikes me as essential. If the db has a certain encoding ISTM we > > are promising that all the text data is valid for that encoding. > > > > The question in my mind is how we help people to recover from the fact > > that we haven't done that. > > Is this any different than the issues of moving 8.0.x to 8.1 UTF8? Where > we had to use iconv? > What issues? I've upgraded several 8.0 database to 8.1. without having to use iconv. Did I miss something? Regards, Mario Weilguni
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: