Re: Estimating seq_page_fetch and random_page_fetch
От | Martijn van Oosterhout |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Estimating seq_page_fetch and random_page_fetch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20070309150147.GB7358@svana.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Estimating seq_page_fetch and random_page_fetch ("Umar Farooq Minhas" <umarfm13@hotmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 07:01:17PM -0500, Umar Farooq Minhas wrote: > displayed, I want cpu cost and io cost displayed separated when i run > EXPLAIN on a particular query. Till now I haven't been able to figure > out a 'clean' way of doing this. Can anyone tell me how much time > should I expect to spend making such a change ? and from where should > I start ? costsize.c ? That's going to be a lot of work. You need to duplicate the variable and eery usage of that variable. And I can't imagine why you'd be interested anyway... > I have another question. Looking at the optimizer code, it pretty > much looks insensitive to the memory factor. The only parameters > being utilized are the "effective_cache_size" ( in estimating index > cost only) and "work_mem" for (sort, aggregation, groups, hash/merge > joins). Are these the only memory factors that DIRECTLY effect the > cost estimates of the planner/optimizer? Sure, what other factors were you considering? Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: