Re: SHA-1 vs MD5
| От | Andrew Sullivan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: SHA-1 vs MD5 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20070307201731.GF19042@phlogiston.dyndns.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | SHA-1 vs MD5 ("Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha" <ezequias.rocha@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: SHA-1 vs MD5
|
| Список | pgsql-sql |
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 05:04:18PM -0300, Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha wrote: > Hi list, > > I know that there is a md5 internal function on postgresql, but I noticed > that it isn't the more secure today. I would like to know if there is a > SHA-1 function implemented yet of, if not, if the team has plan to introduce > it on PostgreSQL. What is the problem you're trying to solve? Md5 is probably good enough for many cases, but for long-term use, you're right that sha-1 is what you need. Actually, you need sha-256, quite frankly. a -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca I remember when computers were frustrating because they *did* exactly what you told them to. That actually seems sort of quaint now. --J.D. Baldwin
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: