Re: postgresql vs mysql
От | Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgresql vs mysql |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20070304144425.1ec70be4.adsmail@wars-nicht.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgresql vs mysql (Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Hello all, On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:02:04 -0600 Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com> wrote: > It swallows column level foreign key contraints and does nothing with > them, no errors nothing, even if you're defining innodb tables. I.e. > this produces not errors: > > mysql> create table a (id int primary key) engine=innodb; > Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.02 sec) > > mysql> create table b (a_id int references a(id)) engine=innodb; > Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.03 sec) > > mysql> insert into a values (1); > Query OK, 1 row affected (0.03 sec) > > mysql> insert into b values (1); > Query OK, 1 row affected (0.03 sec) > > mysql> insert into b values (2); > Query OK, 1 row affected (0.03 sec) > > That last statement should fail. Or the creation of table b should > throw a warning. Or something. It will not fail, cause REFERENCES without FOREIGN KEY get's ignored :-( Thats documented somewhere, but not really fixed, cause standard '92 says, just writing REFERENCE is ok. Oh, and no warning at all, since it is a valid (but ignored) language thing of Mysql. Kind regards -- Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum Failure is not an option. It comes bundled with your Microsoft product. (Ferenc Mantfeld)
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: